The SNP promise that the ‘Queen’ will be retained as head of state in an independent Scotland, but other politicians within the ‘Yes’ campaign have other ideas.
Reported in the ‘Scotsman’ in June 2014, an article about left-wing politicians in a ‘plot’ to ditch the ‘Queen’.
Colin Fox, the Yes Scotland advisory board member and national spokesman for the Scottish Socialist Party condemns the decision to keep the ‘Queen’.
Republican plot to ditch the Queen after Yes vote
Scotland and The People’s Parliament are of the belief that should Scotland have a monarchy then it should be Scottish, not English/German.
How can we have any kind of true independence with an ‘English’ head of state and be continually referred to as ‘Her Majesties’ subjects?
This is why I find the entire campaign confusing and very frustrating.
Here we are, trying to free ourselves from the UK and yet willingly want to stay with another union (EU) be ruled and governed by them and have an English queen.
Is this the people of Scotland idea of independence?
Although many people are in favour of having Queen Lizzie as head of state, there are many more who do not.
But have the people of Scotland been given a choice on the subject?
Has there been any sort of debate with the people of Scotland?
Can you then explain why the ‘Yes’ campaign insist that ALL decisions will be made by the people of Scotland with independence?
They didn’t let you decide on the monarchy, the EU or central banking.
They didn’t ask you what ‘you’ wanted did they?
They made the decisions for you.
The Royal Family
To accept and retain Elizabeth Saxe-Coburg and Gotha (Nee Battenberg/Mountbatten) as head of state, would be the equivalent to accepting the mark of the beast.
Not only has ‘Queen Lizzie’ committed treason many times, including to uphold her ‘oath’, she also signed away our ‘sovereignty’ under the Lisbon Treaty, albeit forced to by Gordon Brown because he had signed the treaty so she was ‘constitutionally’ forced to follow suit.
Gordon Brown forced the treaty into law without the promised referendum.
We are no longer ‘Sovereign’.
We are British Europeans.
Elizabeth was coronated on a fake stone in 1953 and thus
has never been lawfully crowned.
There are those who may wish to argue that this point is irrelevant, as Judge Jeffrey Vincent Pegden did at the trial, wrongly thinking the Coronation is just a ceremony because she has been pretending to be the monarch for over 58 years.
In actual fact the Coronation is a binding oath and a contract,
requiring the monarch’s signature.
At that Coronation ceremony, Elizabeth signed a binding contract,
before God and the British people, that she would do her utmost to
maintain The Laws of God.
This she solemnly swore to do, with her hand placed on the Sovereign’s Bible, before kissing The Bible and signing the contract.
Please note well that in The Law of God, found in the first five books of The Bible, man-made legislation is strictly prohibited.
The very first time that she gave “royal assent” to any piece of
man-made legislation, she broke her solemn oath with God and with the
British people and she ceased to be the monarch with immediate effect.
To date, she has broken her oath thousands and thousands of times,
which is a water-proof, iron-clad, undeniable FACT.
She is therefore without question not the monarch, but instead is a criminal guilty of high treason among her other numerous crimes.
Still want her to be the ‘head of state’?
Not only has she robbed this country blind, she claims the ‘seabed’ as her own.
In fact, it belongs to the ‘Monarch of the State’, the ‘crown’ regardless who sat on the throne.
She is also holding Scotland to ransom over the minerals and oil.
But that’s just the small stuff.
The ‘Royal’ family have been implicated in paedophilia many times.
Paedophile Jimmy Savile named members of the royal family in an interview with police, which have since been removed.
How is it so many paedophiles have been given OBE’s etc and have close links not only to the ‘royals’ but Jimmy Savile also?
The cover-up is immense.
They have also been implicated in child trafficking and murder.
Brandon Turbeville successfully linked proven British pedophile Jimmy Savile to Prince Charles. Conveniently, and follow Savile’s death, his heinous exploits against children were revealed. Among the tales include how he used to tour children’s hospitals and select children for his underground child sex ring. He and the Prince were exceptionally close. In fact, he served as a marriage counselor, of sorts, to Prince Charles. The connections between the two, as pointed out in the Turbeville article, are undeniable. After looking at the evidence, summarized by Turbeville, it is hard to not conclude that Prince Charles did indeed traffic in stolen children. Another royal family member, the Queen, is no stranger to child sex trafficking. – Dave Hodges The Common Sense Show
An interview on BBC Newsnight alleging that Westminster, the Royal Family, top judges and other high authorities have or are linked with the rape of many young boys some 20 years ago, some of which are still in power.
Why would anyone want to be associated in any way to anything ‘royal’?
Why would the people of Scotland wish to have such a family as head of state?
More to the point, why does Alex Salmond?
If you had a choice to vote: Scottish or English Monarch, which would you choose?
Vote now in our poll HERE
*If you feel that any of the information is wrong then please note there is a mountain of evidence to show otherwise. If you have any desire to report this article then please also report the thousands of other articles online. Burying your head in the sand won’t make the problem go away, nor will it make it un-true.